December 28, 1980 (Evening)
Bethlehem Baptist Church
John Piper, Pastor
Simeon's Farewell to the World
If we count our Christmas eve meditations as an exposition of Luke 2:1-20, then we have
arrived in our evening Luke series at chapter 2 verse 21. The unit I want to look at tonight
therefore is 2:21-40. I have called the message "Simeon's Farewell to the World" because
his speech seems to be the central focus of this passage. There are some other things
though that we will want to talk about too. First let's read the text.
And at the end of eight days, when he was circumcised, he was called Jesus, the name
given by the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
And when the time came for their purification according to the law of Moses, they brought
him up to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord (as it is written in the law of the Lord,
"Every male that opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord") and to offer a
sacrifice according to what is said in the law of the Lord, "a pair of turtledoves, or two
young pigeons." Now there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon, and this
man was righteous and devout, looking for the consolation of Israel, and the Holy Spirit
was upon him. And it had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he should not see
death before he had seen the Lord's Christ. And inspired by the Spirit he came into the
temple; and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him according to the
custom of the law, he took him up in his arms and blessed God and said,
"Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word; for mine eyes
have seen thy salvation which thou hast prepared in the presence of all peoples, a light
for revelation to the Gentiles, and for glory to thy people Israel."
And his father and his mother marveled at what was said about him; and Simeon
blessed them and said to Mary his mother,
"Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising of many in Israel, and for a sign that is
spoken against (and a sword will pierce through your own soul also), that thoughts out of
many hearts may be revealed."
And there was a prophetess, Anna, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher; she
was of a great age, having lived with her husband seven years from her virginity, and as a
widow till she was eighty-four. She did not depart from the temple, worshipping with
fasting and prayer night and day. And coming up at that very hour she gave thanks to
God, and spoke of him to all who were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem.
And when they had performed everything according to the law of the Lord, they returned
into Galilee, to their own city, Nazareth. And the child grew and became strong, filled with
wisdom; and the favor of God was upon him.
If you believe, as I do, that God "accomplishes all things according to the counsel of his
will" (Ephesians 1:11), then there are no such things as accidents in an absolute sense.
That is, while there are many events that are not willed by any human (and in that sense
they are accidents), nevertheless there are no events not willed in some sense by God who
controls all things. That means there is divine meaning in all events if we could only see it.
Usually we can't since now we see in a glass darkly. But sometimes in unusual cases of
coincidence, with the help of God's word, we can penetrate through to God's meaning.
There is such a coincidence here in Luke 1 and 2. Why is it that Elizabeth, Zechariah
(John the Baptist's parents), Simeon and Anna are all very old? Why did God ordain that
the parents of the last prophet be aged and that the parents of the Messiah be young?
Why are the two witnesses Simeon and Anna on the point of death when they see Jesus
and testify to him? The question arises not just out of incidental curiosity but because Luke
himself seems to stress their age. He makes it explicit in each case (1:7; 2:29,36f).
There are two clues that suggest a reason for this. First, in all four cases these old people
are pictured as very devout and godly saints. In the case of Elizabeth and Zechariah Luke
stressed that they walked in all the commandments of the law and were righteous before
God (1:6). In the case of Simeon and Anna Luke stressed that they were devout Temple
goers and cherished the hope of the O.T. prophets. Simeon, he says, is "looking for the
consolation of Israel" (2:25). And Anna is "looking for the redemption of Jerusalem" (2:38).
In other words these were model O.T. saints who kept the law of Moses and looked with
eagerness toward the hope of the prophets.
The second clue for why it's old people who welcome Jesus into the world comes from
Luke 16:16, where Jesus says, "The law and the prophets were until John, since then the
gospel of the Kingdom of God is preached. . . " Luke is the only gospel writer that records
this saying of Jesus and so we can see that this was significant for him. Up until John the
Baptist's coming the word and the rule of God had been proclaimed through the law and the
prophets, but now with the arrival of Jesus, the King and his forerunner John, the word and
rule of God is proclaimed and encountered in a new way. Jesus is the Word; Jesus is the
King; the long awaited Kingdom has now arrived (at least partially). For those who believe
in Jesus a tremendous shift occurs: no longer do we live merely in the era of promise with
the law and the prophets awaiting the consolation of Israel. Now we live in the era of
fulfillment when the Kingdom of God is preached as present and powerful, albeit not yet
With those two clues as my guide I would suggest that Luke is illustrating two things by
showing us these four aged OT saints. First I think he wants us to see that an era is
drawing to a close, the era of the law and the prophets. He shows us this by depicting the
best representatives of that era as aged and at the point of death. They are passing away
just like the era of the law and the prophets. The second thing Luke wants to illustrate is
that there is no conflict between the law and the prophets and the new age of the Messiah.
He shows this by depicting the most devout people under the old era as the most receptive
to the new era. Elizabeth and Zechariah and Simeon and Anna do not become resentful
and angry that the Messiah has come, not even that he will be a "light for revelation to the
Gentiles." They rejoice that the new has come.
So Luke prepares us in this way for important issues to come: with Jesus comes a new
age and a new message among the Jewish people: the aged era of the law and prophets is
passing away, behold the new has come. Nevertheless Jesus did not come to abolish the
law and the prophets but to complete them, fulfill them by purchasing the redemption they
offered and living the life they commanded. Therefore, all the true saints of the Old
Testament faith will welcome Jesus with open arms because he fits perfectly as the goal or
climax of their faith. But the hypocrites will reject and persecute him.
Both of these things were important for Theophilus to understand. As a Roman official he
knew that the spreading religion of the Christians was causing disruption in every
synagogue it came to. Riots broke out and there were beatings and disputes. Therefore,
what could he conclude but that the Christians were just another sect distorting the ancient
and respected Jewish religion which had the sanction and protection of the Roman
government? So Luke had to get across to Theophilus that the tumult caused by the
Christian message among the Jews in every city was not because it distorted or rejected
the Jewish faith. On the contrary, the best Jewish saints rejoiced at its coming. There were
other reasons which became clear as the gospel progresses for why Jesus was rejected
and his people persecuted by the Jews.
Luke is very eager to dispel the notion from Theophilus' head that Christianity is disruptive
to peace and order. This may be part of the answer to a question that arises in Luke 2:39
where it says, "And when they had performed everything according to the law of the Lord,
they returned to Galilee to their own city, Nazareth." The question is why Luke omits the
slaughter of the babies in Bethlehem by Herod and the flight to Egypt by Mary and Joseph
and Jesus before returning to Nazareth. There are three possible answers. One is that he
never heard of those events. I find that hard to believe since he knows so much else about
the events surrounding the birth of Jesus and seems to have gotten some of his information
from Mary. A second answer is that the point of the sentence in v. 39 is not that they went
back to Galilee right away but that they fulfilled all the requirements of the law before
leaving Jerusalem. Luke may or may not have known about these events, but they were
beside the point. A third answer, that fits with what we have just seen about Luke's concern
not to let Christianity be seen as violent and revolutionary, is that Luke knew about the
slaughter and the flight to Egypt but purposely omitted them because they might have
created the false impression for Theophilus that this religion has been properly rejected by
the authorities ever since the start and therefore should be resisted not followed.
There is one other theme in our text that fits in here with Luke's concern to present
Christianity as a law-abiding religion which does not reject the Jewish faith. Four times in
this passage Luke draws attention to how the parents of Jesus did everything according to
the Old Testament law. According to verse 23 they presented him as it is written in the law
of the Lord." In verse 24 they offer a sacrifice "according to what is said in the law of the
Lord." In verse 27 "they bring the child to do for him according to the custom of the law.
And in verse 39 they leave Jerusalem only after "they had performed everything according
to the law of the Lord." There must be a message for Theophilus in that stress, namely,
this child did not grow up in a hot bed of sectarianism but in a poor and deeply devout
Jewish household where he was taught all things according to the law of the Lord. So the
era of the law and the prophets may be passing away but it is not because Jesus opposes
the law and the prophets but fulfills them.
There is one other facet of this passage that I should mention before we look at Simeon's
Farewell. I feel I would do Luke an injustice if I did not gather up his references to the Holy
Spirit and say something about them. He has referred to the Holy Spirit 10 times so far
(through 2:40). That in itself shows how important the Spirit is for Luke. But what he says
about the Spirit is even more significant. Here in our text the Holy Spirit was upon Simeon
in verse 25. In verse 26 the Spirit reveals that Simeon will not see death 'til he sees the
Messiah. Then in verse 27 the Spirit moves Simeon to enter the temple at just the right
moment to see Jesus. (Which incidentally is a beautiful illustration of how the Spirit works
to fulfill what the Spirit promises.)
If that is all Luke said about the Spirit's work I suppose we would conclude, as many have,
that before Pentecost the Spirit was upon people but afterwards He is in people. That is a
common view, but an oversimplification, I think. In three places in chapter 1, Luke
describes persons as filled with the Holy Spirit. In 1:15 John the Baptist will be filled with
the Holy Spirit from his mother's womb. In 1:41 Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit and
exclaimed with a loud cry, 'Blessed are you among women.' In 1:67 Zechariah was filled
with the Holy Spirit and prophesied. Now the remarkable thing about this is that the very
phrase used here before Pentecost is used for what happened at Pentecost and often
In Acts 2:3,4 Pentecost morning is described like this: "There appeared to them tongues
as of fire distributed and resting on each of them. And they were all filled with the Holy
Spirit and began to speak in other tongues…" Then in 4:8 Peter is filled with the Holy Spirit
and speaks to the rulers. In 4:31 again the disciples "were all filled with the Holy Spirit and
spoke the word of God with boldness." In 9:17 Ananias is sent to Paul that he may regain
his sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit. Then finally in 13:9 Paul again, is filled with the
Holy Spirit to denounce the magician Elymas. (See also 13:52). And Paul (using a slightly
different Greek verb) says to all Christians: "Don't get drunk with wine but be filled with the
Spirit" (Ephesians 5:18). Which is an amazing parallel to Luke 1:15 where the angel says
of John the Baptist "he shall drink no wine . . . and he shall be filled with the Holy Spirit."
Since the very same phrase is used by the same author before and after Pentecost it
would be unwarranted to say that radically different experiences are meant. What we
should conclude is that what Christians experience as the fullness of the Spirit today was
also experienced by people before Pentecost too. What is distinctively new in our
experience of the Spirit I will save for another time. In the meantime let's not oversimplify
and assume that all the saints prior to Pentecost were somehow spiritually inferior because
they could not enjoy the fullness of the Holy Spirit. (I hope to preach on the Spirit in the
morning services soon.)
Now we turn briefly to Simeon's Farewell to the world (2:29-35). The angel had said, "Glory
to God in the highest and on earth peace among men with whom he is pleased." Now
Simeon, a man of great faith in God's consolation, sees Jesus and is ready to die in peace.
And his peace is not because he has a naive notion that the Messiah will bring only joy
and prosperity to his people. He knows that Jesus will be spoken against, some will fall
because of him. His peace is in the assurance that God keeps his word (he has seen the
Messiah "according to thy word") and somehow beyond all the conflict to come salvation
Most of what Simeon says about Jesus is an application to him of prophesies from Isaiah.
Isaiah 52:10 says, "The Lord has bared his holy arm before the eyes of all the nations and
all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our God." Simeon says, "Mine eyes have
seen thy salvation which Thou hast prepared in the presence of all the peoples. What was
only implicit in the song of Zechariah, namely that the beneficiaries of God's salvation are
not Jews only but also Gentiles. This now becomes explicit in the song of Simeon. Jesus
is the Jewish Messiah who comes to bring glory to Israel, but the mercy shown to Israel
overswells the banks of Israel and brings revelation to all the nations. Isaiah described the
mission of the Messiah like this: "It is too light a thing that you should be my servant to
raise up the tribes of Jacob and to restore the preserved of Israel; I will give you as a light to
the nations that my salvation may reach to the end of the earth" (49:6; cf. 42:6). Isaiah
implies that it would be a dishonor to God's servant-Messiah if he did not give him more to
do than simply restore the glory of an oppressed and sinful Israel. That's too light a thing.
So Simeon, following Isaiah, assigns two tasks to Jesus (this little baby!). As the light of
the world he brings revelation to the nations and glory to Israel. That means that he will
reveal the true God and the true way of salvation to the Gentiles who, as Paul says in
Ephesians 4:18, "are darkened in their understanding, alienated from the life of God
because of the ignorance that is in them due to the hardness of their heart." In Isaiah
42:6,7 God puts it like this: "I have given you as a covenant to the people, a light to the
nations, to open the eyes that are blind, to bring out the prisoners from the dungeon, from
the prison those who sit in darkness. I am the Lord, that is my name. My glory I give to no
other." Therefore, the mission of Jesus to the nations is to open their eyes to who is truly
God and to bring back glory to Him which has been given to all sorts of created things
(Romans 1:20-25; 15:9-12).
And to Israel Jesus brings glory. What is the glory that the godly Israelites longed for?
Zechariah pictured it like this (1:71-75): They are to be delivered from the oppression of all
their enemies and the covenant promises are to be fulfilled so that they may all serve God
without fear in holiness and righteousness before Him all the days of their life. But that did
not happen at Jesus' first coming. Israel rejected their Messiah. In fact God's purpose was
that by means of this very rejection salvation might come to the Gentiles. Paul says in
Romans 11:11, "Through their (Israel's) trespass salvation has come to the Gentiles so as
to make Israel jealous. Now if their trespass means riches for the world and if their failure
means riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their fullness mean?" In rejection their
Messiah Israel unwittingly unleashed a tidal wave of grace in the world. But we should not
think that God is done with Israel yet. Paul goes on in Romans 11 and says, "A hardening
has come upon part of Israel until the full number of the Gentiles comes in and so all Israel
will be saved; as it is written: 'The Deliverer will come from Zion and He will banish
ungodliness from Jacob and this will be my covenant with them when I take away their
sins." Paul does not mean that every individual Jew will be saved that ever lived. Jesus,
said the judgment for some Jews in his day would be worse than for Sodom and Gomorrah
and Paul said in Romans 9:3 that his kinsmen were accursed/cut off from Christ. "All
Israel" means the nation as a whole at some future time when Jesus banishes ungodliness
from Jacob and forgives their sins. They will be saved just like anyone else and will join the
one people of God. This will be the fulfillment of Simeon's prophesy that Jesus will be a
light "for glory to Thy people Israel."
The last part of Simeon's song in verses 34-35 has been implied in what we've said already.
God's plan is to bring the light of salvation to the Gentiles through the Israel's rejection. So
here that rejection is predicted. He will not be well received by all. For many he will be a
sign to be scoffed at, spoken against and rejected. And when men speak against Christ
they stumble and fall. This too is an application of Isaiah's prophecy (8:14; 28:16) which
both Peter (1 Peter 2:6-8) and Paul adapted. Paul wrote in Romans 9:32,33 that Israel
failed to attain righteousness because "they have stumbled over the stumbling stone, as it
is written, 'Behold I am laying in Zion a stone that will make men stumble, a rock that will
make them fall; but he who believes in Him will not be put to shame."' The way God saw fit
to bring salvation to the Gentiles (to us) was to lay a stone in Jerusalem that the vast
majority of Israel would stumble over.
There is a warning here that Paul expresses in Romans 11:19-21. He says to the Gentile
Christians, "You will say, 'Branches (unbelieving Israelites) were broken off so that I might
be grafted in! That's true. They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand fast
only through faith. So do not become proud but fear. For if God did not spare the natural
branches, neither will He spare you." Thus when Simeon says that Christ is set for the rise
and fall of many and for a slandered sign, that thoughts of many hearts may be revealed,
we understand that what is being revealed is whether a person has a heart humble enough
to trust Christ alone for salvation or whether the person's haughty and must be brought low.
In conclusion is it possible to see any unity in the three parts of our study? I think it is.
First we saw that for Luke the era of the law and the prophets has grown old like Simeon
and Anna and is passing away. Christ and the message of His Kingdom has come.
Nevertheless he does not come to abolish but fulfill. There is continuity with the old. The
best O.T. Jewish saints are most receptive to the new age.
Second we saw that Luke depicts this new era as marked by an amazing outpouring of the
Holy Spirit in the book of Acts. But he also shows that this same Spirit was at work in a
similar (though not identical) way in the old era, in Elizabeth and Zechariah and Simeon.
So again there is newness but also continuity between the new and the old.
Finally, we saw in Simeon's song that in this new era of the Messiah salvation would spill
over the boundaries of an unbelieving Israel and reach all the nations of the world. But even
here the old is not abandoned. The Messiah will bring glory to the people Israel when he
banishes ungodliness from Jacob. So again there is newness but also continuity with the
This is a fundamental truth that will affect the way we read our Bibles: with Jesus comes a
new era but the old when properly understood is not against the new but in harmony with it.
© COPYRIGHT John Piper