 The New Birth Part One John G. Reisinger
We want to begin our study on the new birth by looking at three texts of Scripture that speak to this vital subject. The first one shows not only the absolute necessity of being born again, but it also states that being born again is essential before one is able to even 'see' the kingdom of God. In other words, we must have sight, the ability to see, before we can actually see. It is important to remember that seeing does not give us sight but we see only because we have sight. The gift of spiritual sight is given to us in regeneration and we see, or believe, because we have been given spiritual sight.
The second text also shows how the new birth must first take place before faith in Christ is possible; we will work this out in detail later.
The third text shows that man has no more power over the new birth than he has over the wind. Both the wind and the Holy Spirit 'blow' as they please. Everyone knows that man does not have the power to either make the wind blow or force it to stop blowing. However, many sincere Christians do not realize that the same thing is true of the Holy Spirit's work in regeneration. A sinner cannot cause the Holy Spirit to regenerate his dead heart nor can he stop that work when the Holy Spirit purposes to do it! That is exactly what Jesus meant in John 3:8.
When studying the Scriptures it is often necessary to isolate different aspects of truth. However, we must never try to isolate them in personal experience. Justification and sanctification are two entirely different things and yet it is impossible to experience one without the other. Both are an integral part of becoming and being a Christian, but they must still be isolated to be studied. This is also true with regeneration by the Holy Spirit and personal faith in Christ for forgiveness. Regeneration is an essential part of salvation but it is not to be equated with being saved. It is a misuse of the word salvation to limit it to just one aspect of being saved. Salvation has at least three different aspects.
Sadly, our generation has confused 'being saved' with 'being born again.' One of these, being saved, has to do with benefits and the other has to do with power or life. One is the work and act of the sinner and the other the work and act of the Holy Spirit. Notice the following two texts that show this distinction.
Acts 16:31 is talking about the necessity of a sinner having faith in order to be saved. God does not repent for us. The sinner must repent and believe. These are the acts of men and not the acts of God. Faith and repentance are not vicarious. If you have a problem understanding the relationship of these two things, see our tract, "God's Part and Man's Part in Salvation." On the other hand, John 3:8 is talking about power and ability. The work of the Holy Spirit in regeneration is likened to the blowing of the wind. A sinner can no more command or stop the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit than he can make the wind blow or stop a tornado. This is why regeneration is sometimes called "irresistible" grace. Being born again and being saved are both essential. It is impossible to experience one without experiencing the other. The question is not one of time and sequence, that is, which is first and which is second, but rather one of cause and effect. Does our faith cause the new birth or does the new birth cause faith? The question, "Why does one person believe and become saved while another rejects and is lost," will be answered differently according to our understanding of the nature of regeneration. In one case, we will attribute the cause of man's faith to his free will, and in the other case we will give the Holy Spirit the glory for enabling us, by regenerating us, to believe and be saved. Perhaps the following will help. Being saved — Acts 16:31 Benefits our work—our faith essential Acts 16:30—"What must I do?" Answer—"you must believe" Faith—an act of man God does not believe for us Get benefits of salvation Acts 18:27 Being born again John 3:3, 8 Life and power God's work—our faith not involved John 3:7, 8—"What must I do?" No answer! God must something! Regeneration—a sovereign act of God He gives new heart—we believe Get spiritual life and power I Peter: 2:2–3; James 1:18 I. Everyone agrees that man needs to be radically changed. The Bible is quite clear as to the necessity of the new birth. My friend, Doctor Berry frequently asks, "Do you know why Jesus said, 'you must be born again?'" And of course his answer is, "Because you must be born again." George Whitefield preached over two thousand times on John 3:3. When asked why he preached so often on the new birth, he replied, "Because you must be born again." All churches believe you must be born again but they radically disagree on what it means and how it happens. The Roman Catholic, Lutheran, Episcopalian, and Church of Christ all believe this happens through baptism. This is why they believe baptism is essential to salvation. Even Sigmund Freud had a doctrine of the new birth. He called it "An abrupt change in the continuity of the growth of the personality." Boy meets girl – boy falls in love – boy radically changes life style – boy is born again. In America today we are told that over forty percent of our citizens have had a "born again experience." If this is true, it must be the kind that Freud talked about. Most misunderstanding of the true nature of regeneration grows out of a failure to see why the new birth is absolutely essential. One will never understand the what and the how until one clearly sees the why. II. Why is regeneration, or the new birth, so essential? The nature of God demands it. God cannot fellowship or approve of anything that is not perfect. No one can stand in His presence without a total absence of sin and a positive robe of righteousness. We are sinners by nature and practice, and a holy God has no choice but to reject us. We need a spiritual birth that changes us and makes us acceptable to God. The nature of the sinner necessitates a new birth. To be happy in heaven a sinner needs a new nature. Heaven would be a hell to a sinner without a new nature. Even if all his guilt was pardoned and a righteous standing imputed to him, until he is given a new nature, he would hate heaven. A friend has two sons that were constantly trying to impress their father that they loved Jesus and wanted to go to heaven. One day on the way home from church he asked them if they knew what heaven was like. When they had no answer, he explained that in heaven they sing a lot, they pray a lot, and they worship a lot. One of the boys said, "It sounds a lot like a church service." The father said, "Yes, that is a good description." The other son said, "You mean it's even longer than our church service?" About that time I suspect that someone had changed his mind. Actually the sinner cannot even want to believe the gospel until he is first born from above. Some of the verses that speak of man's cannots were covered in the study of depravity. Only one of them will be reviewed here. A comparison of three texts will reveal why a man needs to be born spiritually before he can believe.
One cannot receive and believe something about which he knows nothing and one cannot know something that is totally beyond his ability to apprehend. I Corinthians 2:14 specifically states that a lost man cannot (that is, he does not have the ability to) understand spiritual truth, and therefore it is impossible for him to believe them. John 14:17 shows why this terrible reality is true. The lost man can only experience what he can touch, taste, feel, smell, etc., and God is not known by physical senses but through the Spirit. Jude 19 is one of the best descriptions of a lost man that you will find in all of the Word of God. He is merely a natural man who is totally limited in experiences by his natural instincts. He has all of the attributes of physical life but does not have the Spirit and can know nothing of spiritual life. He needs to be born of the Spirit before he can see, hear, feel, or experience spiritual things. Man 'died' spiritually in the garden when he sinned. The Holy Spirit, the spiritual life of God in man, left Adam and he died spiritually. Now man is merely a 'natural' man without the capacity to experience spiritual things. Regeneration is the Holy Spirit, or the life of God, coming back into the sinner and empowering him with spiritual life and ability. As we mentioned, every church agrees on the necessity of the new birth but they differ greatly on why it is essential and how it takes place. It is impossible to understand the why without grasping the truth of total depravity and its effect of total spiritual inability. III. Exactly What is the New Birth? First of all, it is a literal birth that gives real life. It is the cause of life and evidence that life-giving birth has taken place. However, it is a spiritual birth that gives spiritual life. Just as physical birth gives physical life so spiritual birth gives spiritual life. Secondly, this birth is 'from above.' God is the sole author of this birth. The same Greek word translated again in John 3:3 is translated from above in John 3:31. Now it is true that the new birth is 'second' in that it is after the first birth—first physical then spiritual. However, the emphasis in the Scripture is not on the secondness of the birth but rather its source. It is from above us. It is not from within us; it is not from outside of us or around us; it is from above. It is a life giving birth from God that comes down to us by His power. This new birth has nothing to do with heredity, education, environment, culture, or church ceremonies; it comes directly from God alone. Thirdly, it is 'new' in the sense of RE-generation. It is the sovereign implanting of life in the place of death. Two of the words which are used in the New Testament to describe the new birth or regeneration are born and begotten. They convey the fact of giving life through birth. Other words used are regeneration and renewing. These words show that life is put back into a place where it once was but where there is now only death. The Holy Ghost regenerates our hearts in the same sense that we regenerate a dead battery. Another phrase is quickening or making alive; "you hath He quickened who were dead in trespasses and sin" (Eph. 2:1). Regeneration is a "raising up," and bringing into being a "new creation." We could say, "The Holy Spirit brings dead sinners out of the grave of death, and resurrects the dead to life." Again, it is the idea of giving life to replace death. The new birth is literally a spiritual resurrection out of the spiritual death of sin. What Genesis 1:26, 27 was to physical creation, the new birth is to spiritual creation. Comparing Genesis 5:1–3 with James 1:18 will help us to understand this by providing a picture of the nature and effect of regeneration.
God created a son in "His own likeness" and Adam begat a son in "his own likeness." What does that mean? In both cases it means there is a definite likeness between the father and the child. Adam's son looked liked him, talked like him, walked like him because that son was Adam's true offspring. That son bore the physical image of his father. God created a child who had His nature and bore His spiritual image. That child was a physical creation, but he was also a spiritual being with a nature that saw and appreciated God in all of His works. Just as Adam's child was his true offspring and bore the physical image of his father, so Adam, at his creation, bore the spiritual image God. However, that original likeness to God was forever lost when Adam sinned. Regeneration is God 'begetting' one anew in His image and making him His eternal spiritual child. The first man, Adam was created in the likeness and image of God. After Adam sinned, he begat a son in his own likeness, after his image. James tells us that Christians have been begotten by God. Ever since Adam fell both God and men have been begetting true children in their own respective likeness and image. The children begotten, in both cases, share their father's life, bear his image, looks, nature, appetites, etc. In other words, through physical birth one acquires physical life and bears the nature and likeness of his human father, and through spiritual birth one acquires spiritual life and bears the nature and likeness of his spiritual Father, even God Himself. In both cases there is a true life giving birth, and in both cases the child born is the true offspring of its parent. The Christian is God's child (John 1:12). We are God's seed (Isa. 53:10; I John 3:8). Just as Adam communicated to his posterity, in physical birth and life, his looks, appetites, habits, motivation, and image in physical birth, just so God implants spiritual life and communicates His nature, likeness, motivation, and desires in His seed and they become a "new creation" by spiritual birth. In James 1:18 we read, "Of His [God's] own will begat He us with the word of truth." Christians are called sons of God. Just as Adam begat a son in his own likeness by procreation so in regeneration God begets children in His own image from among sinners. He communicates to the "begotten ones" His likeness, His spiritual looks, and His desires. His children bear His image. They are truly God's offspring and bear God's likeness. Now obviously the first question that one ought to face and seriously consider is this: "Have I been born of God?" One may use a physical birth certificate as proof of birth but one cannot use either a birth or baptismal certificate to prove any divine pedigree! We should ask ourselves: "Do I bear the image of God? Am I a true Christian? Have I been born again? Do I have spiritual life?" When we are truly born of God we bear God's spiritual image just as surely as we bear the physical image of our parents. We are "like God" simply because we are His true children. This should be evident in the way we think and live. Christians disagree about a lot of things but nonetheless, there are some things that are true of every Christian who ever lived or will live. Let me explain. There are some churches that do not believe in mixed bathing. A lot of Christians do not believe that you can smoke and go to heaven. Other Christians believe that women dare not wear makeup or cut their hair. (Why do preachers always pick on the women?) There are Christians who believe, and do not believe, all kinds of things. There was a man on the radio preaching against "loving the world." He was not doing half bad until he decided to clearly explain what God meant by "worldly." He said, "Now any fool who is honest with the Bible knows that God is talking about playing baseball." He then went into a tirade against baseball. One may smile, but I would suspect that any given church has some ideas that are just as strange. I repeat, I know that Christians disagree on a lot of things, but I still insist that there are some things which are true of every Christian who ever lived. It does not matter if he is ten years old or one hundred years old; whether his face is yellow, red, black, or white; whether he lived in the fifth century or the twentieth century; and no matter what his cultural or denominational background is or was. When a person is born of God there are some things that simply must accompany his conversion. Let me illustrate. I had the unforgettable privilege of visiting the mission fields in Africa. Once I was preaching in a place where four different tribes with different dialects were in attendance. There were four different translators. It took an hour to preach a fifteen-minute sermon. Several times I became so engrossed in observing the different faces as the different translators spoke that I forgot what had been said. I had never seen any of those people before that day, but I could have gone through the entire congregation of about two-hundred and fifty people and without a single mistake, pointed to any person and identified the tribe to which that particular person belonged. How? Each person had a tribal mark cut into his face. When they were seven years old slashes were cut into their faces which left welts or scars. The number and direction or slant of the slashes was different in each case. You may have seen pictures of this in missionary meetings. Each tribe had its own mark. When a child is born into that tribe he is marked so that no matter where he goes he bears the tribal marks of his birth. My friend, I assure you that the same thing is true of "God's tribe." Every Christian carries the tribal marks written in him by the Holy Spirit in regeneration. There are some distinguishing tribal marks on the people of God. When the Holy Ghost of God brings the new birth He always writes the proof of His work in the heart and experience of every "begotten one." I John sets forth nine tribal marks that are true of every child of God. We may disagree about many things, but every Christian wants to please God. He loves the revealed law of God and is committed to keeping it with all of his heart because it is the law of his heavenly Father and his Savior (I John 2:3, 4). If a person does not love the brethren he ought to doubt his salvation (I John 3:13–16). Why is John so emphatic? Because the new birth communicates the nature of God to His offspring. This is one of the ways to test one's conversion. A friend of mine from years past was a fine lawyer and worked as a District Attorney for some time. A young lady came to him and accused a certain man of being the father of her baby. The man denied it and refused to marry her or do anything to help financially. At that time it was difficult to prove in court who the father was if the mother had slept with more than one man. Five men testified that they had slept with this girl within the time frame when the girl had gotten pregnant. It seemed impossible to prove the accused man was really the father. When the baby was born it had a very strange looking forehead. Instead of going straight up, the baby's forehead went back at about a forty-five degree angle. My lawyer friend had the mother sit where the jury could clearly see the baby's strange forehead. The accused man also had a strange forehead. In fact, his forehead was identical to the baby's. It also went back at a forty-five degree angle. The jury listened to all five men testify that they had slept with the girl. They listened to all of the technical, legal and medical arguments. They looked at the baby and they looked at the man and said, "You are guilty." They knew that man was that child's father because the father's physical image was stamped in the child. My friend, the same is true in the spiritual realm. The Father's image is stamped in every one of His children. Do you and I bear the marks of the image of God in our hearts and lives? Do we exhibit the proof of the work of the Holy Ghost in the way we think and act? Can you and I prove our divine pedigree? Can we prove that we have been regenerated? Have we been born of God? I must digress for just a moment and insist that regeneration is not merely a theological doctrine about which to argue. It is a spiritual experience that is essential to true conversion! God, by His power, works and writes His very nature in our hearts and lives and He always leaves "living proof." I fear some reformed people preach their own election. They think that understanding and talking about sovereign grace is the same thing as experiencing it. Being born again is not something you believe, it is something that you personally experience. You do not look at either your birth or baptismal certificate to see if you are part of the elect of God. Do not examine your denominational creed or your knowledge of the doctrines of grace to discover your election. Honestly examine your heart and life to see whether the Holy Ghost of God has given you spiritual life. Have you been spiritually and powerfully drawn to know, love and worship God Himself? That is the question. This is what Jesus meant in John 6:44, 45. Too often verse 44 is used to prove "total inability" [and it clearly does so] and verse 45 is ignored. John 6:44 and 6:45 must never be separated, either in our theology or our experience. Look carefully at the verses beginning with verse 44: "No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him . . ." Jesus has just taught the doctrine of election. The Jews started to murmur at him. He responded, "You want to murmur at what I said. I'll really give you something to chew on." He then hit them with the doctrine of total depravity. "No man can come to me, except the Father … draw him …" Jesus does not stop there. He goes on to declare the truth of irresistible grace in verse 45. "It is written in the prophets. And they shall all be taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me." Notice the comparison in these two verses. John 6:44 says, "No man can come," and John 6:45 says, "every man who learns of the Father …comes to me." Drawing, hearing, and learning in these verses all refer to the same thing. Whatever "drawing by the Father" means in verse 44, the same thing is meant by "learned of the Father" in verse 45. Verse 44 is teaching inability. "No man can …unless …" Verse 45 is teaching effectual calling. "Every man does … when …" Verse 44 is affirming total inability and verse 45 is showing that regeneration brings men to Christ in spite of that depravity. Every man who "hears" or "learns of the Father" will always, without exception come to Christ in faith, and no sinner will ever come apart from the special regenerating work of the Holy Spirit. The new birth from God is a work that always produces saving faith and salvation. However, I repeat, we are talking about an experience and not just an abstract doctrine over which we argue. I ask you once more, "Are you a Christian?" I could say, "Have you been born again?" Or I could ask, "Do you bear the marks, the pedigree, the tribal marks of the work of the Holy Ghost in your life?" Regeneration is nothing less than the giving of spiritual life to a dead sinner. It is literally "being born of God." IV. How Does The New Birth Take Place? How is a man born of God? First of all, it is not produced by baptism. Neither the sprinkling of a child nor the immersion of an adult can regenerate a dead heart. Even if immersed by the apostle Paul, or sprinkled as a child by John Calvin (or both) one still must be "born again." Baptism, in any form, can neither wash away sin nor create a new heart. There are two texts of Scripture, which I think should settle the question of baptismal regeneration forever. "For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers: for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel" (I Cor. 4:15). Paul is here addressing people who have been begotten in the gospel through his ministry. He was their spiritual father. He was the only person who could say, "You are, under God's blessing, one of my converts." However, the apostle also says the following to the very same individuals: "I thank God I baptized none of you" (I Cor. 1:14). Do you see the logic of the two statements? If a man is regenerated or begotten by baptism it would be impossible for Paul to say, "I did not baptize any of you even though I have begotten you." If you put these two verses together, they prove beyond any doubt that baptism can have nothing at all to do with regeneration. If baptism is either essential, or in any way contributes, to the new birth, then Paul could not have "begotten" converts without baptizing them. His argument and statements would be self-contradictory. The hymn writer was correct: "What can wash away my sin? Nothing but the blood of Jesus." Water, whether it is a few drops on our head as a child or a tank full into which we are immersed as an adult, cannot get into our heart where the change has to take place. A missionary told of witnessing for many years to a Moslem friend. She was soon to go home and would not be returning because of ill health. She earnestly pleaded with God for one more opportunity to witness the gospel to her friend. One day she saw the Moslem lady start down to the sacred river for a bath. The missionary quickly put some clothes in a box, tied the box tight shut, and went down to the river and began dipping the box in the river. The Moslem lady asked her what she was doing and she replied that she was washing her clothes. Her friend smiled and said, "They will never get clean because the water cannot get inside to where the dirt is." The missionary asked, "Do you believe that water in which you are bathing can get into your heart where the sin is and wash it clean?" Secondly, the new birth is not dependent upon church sacraments. Partaking of the Lord's table, no matter how regularly, cannot give one a new heart. Paul forever put the death knell to the foolish notice that church sacraments can give spiritual life.
We may substitute baptism, or anything else, for circumcision in these verses and not change the teaching of these verses. The new creation is regeneration by the Holy Ghost. That is all a poor sinner needs, but he vitally needs that great work. Thirdly, being born again has nothing whatsoever to do with human authority. Dr. Billy Graham may have personally put his hand on your head and told you that you are a Christian. That does not make you a child of God. That does not prove that you are born of God. Fourthly, the new birth is not merely a correct knowledge of theology. Some current "Calvinists" are reviving an old heresy. It is called "doctrinal regeneration." They associate true salvation with a clear knowledge of Calvinistic theology. Some of these people imply that John Calvin is going to stand at heaven's door and examine you on your knowledge of the 'five points' (they call this the gospel) to see whether you get in or not. Not so, beloved! The five points are not the gospel. The gospel is "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved." The five points are what makes the gospel work. Election never saved a single soul, but it does make certain that some will be saved. Lastly, being born again has nothing to do with a man's so called "free will." Many people balk at this point. Look again at John 1:12, 13, and carefully examine the relationship of the two verses.
These Scriptures emphatically, categorically, and specifically state that we are "not born of the will of man." We are "born of God." Verse 12 tells what one must do to be saved. He must willingly receive Christ. The promise is that one will become a child of God when he receives Christ. The verse is clear. The tense of the verbs in these two verses is of utmost importance, please notice. John did not say, "All who receive him, will be, as a result of believing, born of God." This would make faith to be the cause of the new birth. No, John said just the opposite. The people who receive Christ do so only because they have been (past tense) born of God. Their spiritual birth caused their act of faith. Verse 13 is not giving the result of verse 12, but rather the cause. Verse 13 tells exactly who the people are, in verse 12, that received Christ. The people in verse 12 willingly received Christ only because they were (past tense "had been") born of God. Do not mix up a "would be" consequence with a "had been" certainty. Every man who is born of God (v. 13) will always gladly receive Christ (v. 12). Receiving Christ (v. 12) is the certain result of being born of God (v. 13). I John 5:1 teaches the same. "He that believeth that Jesus is the Christ is (already) born of God." John does not say that one will be born of God if he believes, but rather, if one believes it proves that he has been born of God. Faith is the fruit of being born again and not the cause. Some may say, "Mr. Reisinger, you are just quibbling over words. You cannot prove that from this text of Scripture." I am sorry, but the text can mean nothing else. This point may be proven by comparing I John 5:1 with I John 2:29. The identical construction is used but the subject is "doing righteousness" instead of being born again. The text: "He that doeth righteousness is born of God." Is it just quibbling over words to insist that no one is born of God because he does righteousness? Do you not agree that we do righteousness only after, and only because, we have been born of God? We clearly know which is the cause and which is the effect in this verse. No one believes that "doing righteousness" causes one to born of God. That destroys the gospel. The same identical truth is set forth in I John 5:1. Our faith does not cause the new birth, but, like "doing righteousness," our faith is a living proof that we have been born of God. To deny this clear fact is to destroy the biblical doctrine of regeneration. A man cannot "born" (active voice) himself, but he must "be born" (passive voice) from above. When an evangelist announces that he is going to preach on "What you must do to be born again," do not waste time going to hear him. I assure you that the man does not know what he is talking about. The man may preach about "being saved," but certainly not about "being born again." There is no denying that a sinner must willingly repent and believe the gospel in order to be saved, but not to be born again. We are insisting that only God can give the power, or the "want to," that enables one to repent and believe. Sometimes I like to tease people in order to stimulate them to think. When people argue for the doctrine of man's "free will," I often say to them, "I do not discuss the doctrine of free will with anybody who doesn't believe in eternal security." They usually say, "Who said anything about eternal security?" I look rather puzzled and ask, "You surely do not believe a sinner has a free will and also believe that a saint can never be lost?" They almost always reply emphatically, "Yes, I do." In pretended surprise, I ask, "Are you saying that a sinner has the will power to either accept or reject Christ?" When they affirm that they believe this, I ask, "Can a saint will, or choose, his way out of grace?" When they say "No," I reply, "Well, if the sinner has power to both accept and reject, but once he accepts, he can no longer choose to be lost, it sounds to me that you believe a sinner has twice as much will power as a saint. You are saying that we lose part of the freedom of will that we supposedly had before we were saved." The dialogue usually ends at this point. It is nonsense to hold to a doctrine that teaches that man loses half of his will power when he is converted. It is impossible to believe both free will and eternal security. They are self-contradictory. The new birth is something that "God does in us, without us." It is His sovereign work but it always produces fruits in our lives. Let me try to illustrate this. Suppose that I was away from home for a speaking engagement and after the service my car would not start. When I turned the key in the ignition there was not even a buzz. I flipped the light switch and there was not even a flicker. I pressed the horn and there was not even a peep. Someone would probably say, "Mr. Reisinger, I think your battery is dead." Suppose they were correct and the battery was indeed dead. I leave the car in the church parking lot and go off to bed. The next morning I once more try to start the car and the motor immediately turns over. There are three possible explanations of what happened. (1) The battery was not really dead, I just thought it was. (2) A miracle took place (phone Pat Robertson). (3) Somebody re-charged, or "regenerated," the battery. Now just suppose the various parts of my car had the power of speech. Suppose, the evening before, I would have said, "Lights, if you will only shine that will put life in the battery." Or, "Horn, if you will only blow that will put life in the battery." If my car could speak it would have replied, "If you put some life in the battery I guarantee you the horn will blow, the lights will shine, and the motor will start." So it is with the man who is dead in sin. His spiritual battery is dead. None of his facilities will work until he is "regenerated." When God gives a sinner life, he will repent, believe, pray, etc. Appealing to a lost man's will as the source of power to save him is like appealing to the lights and the horn. It is life that the lost man needs just as the car battery needs life. The most powerful spiritual feat possible is the exercise of faith. It can move mountains. Does a dead man produce the spiritual power to perform the powerful act of faith, or does he do this because of regeneration and the gift of a new nature? When I come back and found the battery working, I would assume that somebody had been "fooling around underneath the hood." Wouldn't you? Some years ago my wife and I took our son and daughter-in-law to a Bible conference. My son was a good "All-American" boy but we weren't really sure if he had been converted. He knew all of the right answers but did not seem to have a thirst after God. I preached four messages on the doctrine of total depravity. After the second message my son came up to me and said, "Dad, that's the first sermon I ever heard you preach. Something happened to me tonight. I think I got converted." He has not been the same since that night. He now exhibits the fruits of true conversion. I believe that night Somebody was "fooling around under the hood." My son had heard me preach for twenty-two years, but that night he "heard the voice of Christ." That night he was regenerated and believed the gospel. Have you ever witnessed to a person for years but they paid no attention to you? Then one day you see them reading a Bible and they show up at church. What had happened? Somebody was fooling around under the hood. You prayed for your children and instructed them in the word of God but it seemingly went in one ear and out the other. Then one day, like my son, they say to you, "Why did you not tell me this before?" You smile and realize that Someone was fooling around under the hood. The Holy Ghost has been charging a dead battery. That is what the Bible calls regeneration and this is what we need to see today. We do not need better buildings, preachers, or music programs. We need Someone with the power to do something under the hood. |